The National Association for Veterans Rights (NAVR) has filed an Amicus Curiae Brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to help ensure the Court has the benefit of a broader perspective on issues affecting Veterans seeking disability benefits. At its core, this case is about ensuring the law clearly distinguishes between those who represent Veterans before the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs under the federal accreditation system and those who provide lawful claims assistance outside of that system.
That distinction matters.
Veterans deserve strong consumer protections. They also deserve the freedom to choose from ethical, transparent organizations that help them navigate an often complex disability claims process. NAVR believes those two principles are not mutually exclusive, they are complementary.
Our Amicus Brief provides the Court with industry perspective based on years of experience working alongside policymakers, Veterans, and organizations committed to serving Veterans responsibly. The Brief explains why maintaining a clear distinction between federally accredited representatives and non-accredited claims consultants is essential to preserving Veteran choice while ensuring appropriate consumer safeguards.
On July 22, 2026, the Court granted NAVR’s Motion for Leave to File its Amicus Curiae Brief, meaning our arguments will be considered alongside those of the parties as the Fifth Circuit reviews this important appeal. While the Court has not yet ruled on the merits of the case, this represents an important opportunity to help shape the legal framework governing Veterans claims assistance, not only in Louisiana, but also, potentially across the country.
“This case has implications that extend far beyond Louisiana. NAVR filed this Amicus Brief because we believe it is important for the Court to hear from an organization dedicated to protecting Veteran choice and promoting ethical standards in claims assistance,” said Peter O’Rourke, President of NAVR. “We have a responsibility to help ensure the Court understands what’s at stake for every Veteran, the ability to access lawful, ethical assistance while preserving the freedom to make informed choices about who they trust to help them pursue the benefits they have earned.”
This filing reflects NAVR’s continued commitment to advancing thoughtful public policy, promoting ethical standards across the claims assistance industry, and ensuring the voices of Veterans and responsible stakeholders are represented in legal and legislative discussions that shape the future of Veteran services. We will continue to monitor this case and provide updates as the appeal progresses.
Read the Amicus Brief Here
Read the Order Granting MFL to File Amicus Brief